. . . and a third time.
At Mass this past Sunday, the song leader decided to give an extra-special introduction to a song. It went along these lines: "This Sunday in addition to celebrating the Ascension and Mothers' Day, our Spanish-speaking brothers and sisters are celebrating Cinco de Mayo, so we'll sing Resucito."
How much bad thinking can be packed into one sentence? Let's see. (BTW, as far as the music that's used in Mass that was composed after 1900, Resucito is actually not that bad in my book.)
1. The Feast of the Ascension is a major feast of the Church and a mystery of the Holy Rosary. It carries with it enough material that there's not much reason to tag anything else on to it.
2. While Mothers' Day is something that is quite nearly universally observed by Americans, it isn't properly what the Church is celebrating on any given day. As odd as it seems to celebrate the Ascension on a Sunday, that is what the Church does in most American dioceses. The Ascension is a particularly Christian celebration and the Church celebrates that which pertains to Her Divine Husband, rather than secular ephemera, no matter how well intentioned.
3. While it may be PC to refer to "our Spanish-speaking brothers and sisters", it's also not very accurate. The significance of May 5 has nothing to do with what language one speaks. It commemorates the Mexican army's defeat of a French force. It celebrates Mexico (and, to some extent, denigrates France). Of late 5o de Mayo seems to have become little more than a general secular excuse for drunken revels with colorful costumes, on a par with All Hallow's Eve or March 17th. While there is much to celebrate about Mexico and much to denigrate about France, neither of those are proper topics to include in the Holy Mass even on a day that isn't already a major feast of the Church on its own. General drunken revelry is similarly not a particularly appropriate appendage to corporate worship.
4. If it is really just "Spanish-speaking brothers and sisters" that celebrate May 5, then why is there any commemoration of it at a Mass that has a pronounced paucity of speakers of any Iberian language?
5. It beggars description to celebrate a holiday that is named "the fifth day of May" on any day that isn't itself the fifth day of May. At least start calling it something like "The glorious Mexican rout of the French" if the celebration is to extend for multiple days.
6. The song in question has nothing to do with Mexico. It was written by a Spaniard. (But, since it has to do with the resurrection and the Feast of the Ascension takes place during the Easter season, it isn't wholly inappropriate.)
7. If one objects to having any part of the Mass in Latin (as our music leader does) on the grounds that people won't understand it, courtesy obliges one to refrain from using songs in any language that the people don't speak fluently.
At the risk of spreading an equine puree, when one speaks publicly in a forum that makes one appear to be an authority on the Church, it is imperative that such a one closely examine what he says to be sure that it in fact comports with the teachings of the Church and Her Dear Lord.

4 Comments:
You know that you are in trouble when a "song" needs an introduction during Mass.
Actually, given the apparent outlook of the "song leader (is that really his title?)," "Resucitó," which I have sung many many times since I was perhaps eleven and have always detested (maybe your parish does not do the trap set and cymbal), is highly appropriate.
Cinco de Mayo in the United States is, as far as I can tell, an American schoolmarm invention to fill the monthly "holiday" bulletin board. In general, it is not meaningful to Mexicans. Rather, it is typically allowed to be celebrated by American white folks so that they can feel sensitive and eat crispy tacos with ground beef and cheddar cheese. Why not? If Mexicans decide to honor Armistice Day or Arbor Day with a party to delight their little white friends, I will go along with it. I will be puzzled, but I will not turn down the hamburgers.
(It could be argued that Cinco de Mayo is an anti-Catholic holiday specifically promoted by a Masonic Mexican government interested in preserving the sanctity of Benito Juarez ... if the government had been very successful in promoting it.)
So tokenism is the order of the day, actually.
The one big boo-boo that I see is related to your comment about its not being the Cinco de Mayo. You are most certainly right; it was most certainly not. Mexican holidays are always celebrated on their exact date if not the evening before. Now, in those few places and situations in Mexico in which Cinco de Mayo is celebrated, I know for a fact that many "hicieron puente" and did not work on Friday, but the celebration was over on Thursday at the latest.
By the way, ¡Feliz día de las madres (invariably May 10 in Mexico as well as other countries)!
The Solemnity of Mother's Day will be observed in all parishes of the United States.
Resistance is futile. (And also very hard to express without sounding like a bad person. "What, you hate mothers?")
We love to celebrate ourselves, but by 2020 "Mother's Day" will be insufficiently inclusive. It will then be "Gyno Day". The opening song (at least in Episcopalian parishes) will include Helen Reddy's "I am Woman".
Post a Comment
<< Home